by DaviddesJ
slumcat wrote:
You forgot to point out that card #354 is a piece of fluff that the game functions perfectly well without.
I "forgot" to mention that because it wasn't necessarily true in my example. That's the whole point of my question: do you reject the idea that any such marketing could be manipulative, or do you just think that it's not applicable in this case?
If I understand correctly, your answer is that you don't think it's an issue in this case, because the exclusive items are not that exclusive and/or significant, but you would be more concerned if they were.